Make It Happen
My Tipsheets are chock full of ideas. They are all aimed at translating knowledge into a quick, action-oriented 60-second nugget.

First Name:
Last Name:
Tipsheet Archive
Randall's Resources
Whenever I speak or write, I often prepare extra "bonus" materials.
Enter the Resource Code to access this special content:
Resource Code:
Try this example Resource Code: eventplanning


Insight: Should AIDA be replaced?

by Randall Craig on October 24, 2014

Filed in: Blog, Insight, Make It Happen Tipsheet, Marketing, Strategy

Tagged as: ,

In 1903, Elias St. Elmo Lewis coined one of the most important marketing frameworks: AIDA. It has stood the test of time, and has helped many marketers more strategically plan their campaigns. AIDA is an acronym for Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action. But is AIDA intrinsically flawed, or perhaps no longer relevant for today’s more complex marketplace?

The genius of AIDA is that a marketer need only activate each phase of AIDA, and the campaign will be successful.

  • Attention: Look over here!
  • Interest in your solution: Here are the benefits of using us.
  • Desire: I should do something about it
  • Action: OK, I will transact.

Contrast this with the Relationship Curve – a competing, a more modern framework developed by 108 ideaspace:

  • Awareness: I am aware of my problem, and I am aware of you.
  • Preference: I prefer you, I think you can take care of it. This is the initial seed of loyalty.
  • Trial: This is where the hypothesis of sustainability is put to the test. Examples of Trial include trying on a suit before purchase, or test-driving a car.
  • Commitment: The contract is signed and the transaction takes place. If the experience is a positive one, then loyalty is locked in, resulting in repeat business. Loyalty also drives advocacy resulting in even more business, but this time from others.

AIDA assumes that after the need is crystallized (Desire) the user immediately acts. But what action is the model referring to? Is it trial? If so, why not explicitly say so? If it is purchase, then the critical intermediate step of trial is missing.

The fundamental flaw with AIDA, however, is that it is transactional and campaign-oriented. In contrast, the underlying premise of the Relationship Curve is the growing relationship between two parties, and the activities required to improve that relationship.

Is AIDA dead? Not exactly, and it’s better than nothing. But it may have had its day.

This week’s action plan: The most important part of the Relationship Curve is not just the initiatives that are underneath each stage, but a recognition of what drives the target market’s movement from one stage to another.  This week, plot your existing marketing initiatives on the relationship curve:  Do you need to fill in a gap, or remove ones that are overkill.

Application note:  The Relationship Curve is surprisingly flexible.  Consider the recruitment process:  Awareness may be a job posting, Preference is the selection of resumes, Trial is the interview, and Commitment is the offer.  Or on a personal level, consider the relationship between you and your best friend.  You met somewhere (Awareness), learned more about each other (Preference), and went out on a date (Trial).  For Commitment, let’s just say people have different ideas about how much Trial is necessary before making a Commitment…

Note: The Make It Happen Tipsheet is also available by email. Go to to register.

Randall Craig

@RandallCraig (follow me)
:  Professional credentials site
.com: Web strategy, technology, and development
:  Interviews with the nation’s thought-leaders