Make It Happen
My Tipsheets are chock full of ideas. They are all aimed at translating knowledge into action...in a quick, action-oriented 60-second nugget.

First Name:
Last Name:
email:
Tipsheet Archive
Randall's Resources
Whenever I speak or write, I often prepare extra "bonus" materials.
Enter the Resource Code to access this special content:
Resource Code:
Try this example Resource Code: eventplanning

Associations

Do you see your website, CRM, social media, and other digital initiatives as a way to improve service levels, market your organization, or be a central part of your thought leadership strategy?  While important, at best these are tactical approaches:  too often the bigger opportunity of digital transformation is ignored.

This isn’t surprising, as digital initiatives are often driven from marketing or IT, not from the board or the CEO.  When it is driven from the top, the question is more about digital transformation and the disruptive business models that the organization might adopt: after all, it is better to be a disruptor than be disrupted.  Here are seven:

  1. White label:  In this model, your organization provides a behind-the-scenes capability that others can incorporate into their offerings. A related strategy is co-branding, where your capability is “co-branded” with an organization who has client relationships.
  2. Vertical integration:  Think of the value chain, and particularly the functions both before and after your organization interacts with your key stakeholders.  Many accounting firms, for example, also provide bookkeeping services.  Amazon is now getting into the freight and delivery business, both with drone delivery at one end, and the purchase of a fleet of 40 Boeing 767 cargo planes.
  3. Software as a service:  This is the quintessential capacity rental business, made popular by Salesforce, but now adopted by many.  Other examples include Microsoft Office 365 and Adobe Creative Cloud.
  4. Toolmaker:  This strategy is one where you build “tools” that others incorporate into their processes and their technology.  Stripe, the online payments processor, specializes in building developer tools that enable ecommerce.
  5. Debundling:  Instead of thinking of your organization as a single entity, is it possible to unbundle it and optimize each part?  A newspaper, for example, could think of itself as a content producer, a printer, a delivery/logistics operation, and an ad sales organization. Even these can be debundled: a content producer, for example is really reporting, writing, and editing.
  6. Shared service provider:  Associations at one point operated almost as a private club – a guild.  Modern associations, on the other hand, are far more experienced, and have operations including advocacy, accreditation, certification, training, event management, community building, job/career boards, and more. But what if they built a shared service capacity, providing all manner of for-profit services for their members? As they know more about the industry than anyone else, there may be possibilities for procurement, portfolio management, accounting, logistics, and more.
  7. Crowdsourcing:  This model brings key stakeholders directly into the business model itself:  YouTube is built with user-generated content, Uber is built with independent drivers, AirBNB is built using homeowners.

While not every organization might choose to be disruptive, the thinking behind it is important…  and should weigh into the digital investment decision.

This week’s action plan: Is your organization thinking of digital transformation?  If so, how much time has been spent considering the connection to your organization’s business model?  This week, choose one of these models, and whiteboard the digital implications.

Note: The Make It Happen Tipsheet is also available by email. Go to www.RandallCraig.com to register.

Randall Craig

@RandallCraig (follow me)
www.RandallCraig.com
:  Professional credentials

www.108ideaspace.com: Digital strategy, technology, and design
www.ProfessionallySpeakingTV.com
:  Interviews with the nation’s thought-leaders

{ 0 comments }

Software has a cost, but it may not be as clear as you may think.  Yes, purchasing Excel may be straightforward, but what about CRM, Marketing Automation, a new financial system, or any other core database that requires collaboration across the organization?

In the olden days, it was relatively simple:  the application was usually custom-written, and the support fee was somewhere between 15-20% of the development cost.  Today, it is far more complex.  The cloud promises to eliminate your needs for internal support staff, maintenance, etc.  And cloud vendors entice you with selling propositions such as “Only $125/month”… but the hidden costs can be so much higher.  Consider the following cost elements:

  • Base application
  • “Apps” and plug-ins (usually a subscription)
  • Customization
  • Data cleansing
  • Data migration
  • Connection/integration with other software
  • Testing
  • Customized documentation
  • Training
  • License fees
  • Support fees

Then there are the internal costs that directly impact the value that will ultimately be delivered by the software:

  • Needs analysis
  • Process re-engineering
  • Change management
  • Project post-mortem

Finally, there are two hidden costs that are rarely considered:

  • Opportunity cost of the software not being a “perfect fit”
  • Opportunity cost of not using the software to drive your a unique competitive advantage

It is these last two costs that are connected to one of the most difficult choices an organization must make as it decides on a software platform:  custom development, packaged proprietary software, or flexible framework.

1) Custom-developed software:  This software is built exclusively for the organization by a developer, often because the needs are so unique that there is nothing “in the market” that can do the job.  The advantage is the perfect fit: the software can leverage the unique capabilities of the organization and precisely drive strategic goals.  Two key disadvantages of this approach are the cost, and the significant time that it takes to design, develop, and deploy a custom solution.  It is because of these disadvantages that proprietary  packaged software became so popular.

2) Proprietary packaged software:  Whether it is delivered using client-server technology or via the cloud, proprietary packaged software is relatively simple: there is a feature list in the base application, additional “modules” that might be purchased, and often the option to skin the software with an organization’s colors (and logo).

Advantages center around cost, but also in that many vendors tout that the software embeds functional “best practices”.  The key disadvantages of this approach are the opportunity costs: because the software does not have the flexibility to be customized, the organization will need to change to fit the software – no small endeavor.  Furthermore, because others are using the exact same software, the software itself cannot provide or support any of the organization’s inherent strategic advantages.  Even the assumption that the software truly does embed best practices is open to question: who says that the best practices for others are the best practices for you?  Finally, as the organization’s needs change over the years, there is no ability to have the software adapt to these changes.  It is because of these factors that a flexible framework approach has become so popular.

3) Flexible framework software: Using this approach, the base capability of the software is already developed, but it can be customized by a developer to be a perfect fit.  Examples of this include SharePoint or Salesforce: it is possible to use this software out of the box, but both have very robust development environments, as well as add-ins/apps that extend the functionality significantly.

The key advantage of a flexible framework is that core functionality has already been developed, speeding deployment – yet significant customization is not just possible, but expected; this reduces the opportunity cost, or sometimes removes it completely. The disadvantage of a flexible framework is that when comparing the “feature set” to the packaged software alternative, a flexible framework rarely wins.  And because flexible frameworks are so often delivered via the cloud, not every organization is ready to make this leap.

Back to the cost of software: When comparing each of these approaches, comparing costs means evaluating each of the 16 different cost dimensions identified earlier: they are very different depending on the approach.  At the core of the decision, however, is how you view the software itself: is it a necessary expense, or is it an investment that can drive the business?  Many organizations see an accounting system as an example of the former, and CRM and marketing automation as examples of the latter.

This week’s action plan:  How is your organization set up? Has it started to make the transition to flexible frameworks?  This week, take an inventory of the software that you use: is it custom-developed, proprietary packaged, or a flexible framework?

Note: The Make It Happen Tipsheet is also available by email. Go to www.RandallCraig.com to register.

Randall Craig

@RandallCraig (follow me)
www.RandallCraig.com
:  Professional credentials

www.108ideaspace.com: Web strategy, technology, and development
www.ProfessionallySpeakingTV.com
:  Interviews with the nation’s thought-leaders

{ 0 comments }

Consumerization

by Randall Craig December 23, 2016

Wikipedia defines consumerization as the reorientation of product and service designs to focus on (and market to) the end user as an individual consumer, vs an earlier era of organization-oriented offerings.  It speaks to growing markets by looking for a completely different category of buyer, who may also be an influencer for the organizational purchase. Of greater […]

Read More

Insight: Building High Performance Boards

by Randall Craig September 2, 2016

Have you ever considered why some boards (or senior management teams) are more effective than others? While the usual reasons may include individual skills and knowledge, attitude, strong staff support, and infrastructure, one of the most powerful drivers of board performance – and also one of the most overlooked – is the onboarding process. Consider: […]

Read More

The Sharpest Point (2)

by Randall Craig July 8, 2016

Have you ever listened to a presentation, and felt the signal-to-noise ratio could have been improved?  Or have you ever delivered a critical presentation, and felt that you could have done better… but you were not precisely sure how? Too often we add debris into our presentations.  These are those filler words, unrelated sidebars, and administrative notes that […]

Read More

Ten Questions to Improve Data Quality

by Randall Craig May 6, 2016

Marketing has progressed significantly from the days of direct mail addressed to “occupant”. Or has it? I recently received a snail-mail letter from a major corporation, addressed to Rondo Greg – not Randall Craig. My wife recently received an email addressed to her work address, asking whether her company – a major financial institution – would be […]

Read More

Monetizing IP: Implementing an eLearning program

by Randall Craig January 31, 2016

Do you generate content (or training materials) for staff, prospects, clients, and other third parties?  If so, you probably know that doing it right is not easy-  and often is hit or miss.  In a previous post, we explored the business rationale and the alternatives for monetizing this knowledge via eLearning; in this post, we describe how it can […]

Read More

When to fire your web developer (18 reasons)

by Randall Craig December 18, 2015

Every organization has its group of trusted partners: accountant, lawyer, banker… and web developer. They know your history, strategy, and people, and are available to help when their special skills are needed. But how do you know when it is time to move on from the relationship? While we can’t precisely help with the other […]

Read More

Ten webinar utilization strategies

by Randall Craig October 16, 2015

Many marketers use webinars as an important strategy, but given the large investment developing the content, finding (and registering) attendees, and the logistics of production, how can you maximize the return on your webinar investment? Here are ten ideas that can help: Include a clear and easy call to action near the end of webinar.  Information is nice, […]

Read More