Make It Happen
My Tipsheets are chock full of ideas. They are all aimed at translating knowledge into action...in a quick, action-oriented 60-second nugget.

First Name:
Last Name:
email:
Tipsheet Archive
Randall's Resources
Whenever I speak or write, I often prepare extra "bonus" materials.
Enter the Resource Code to access this special content:
Resource Code:
Try this example Resource Code: eventplanning

Viewpoint

Consider the newest words entering our vocabulary: Kindle, eReader, Nook, iBooks, and Kobo.  Let me add one more:  iCensorship.

If the stats are to be believed, our eBook purchases on these devices are fast eclipsing traditional print books. This isn’t surprising, as eBooks are not bulky, don’t kill our forests, and they’re cheaper.

Despite these advantages, they are not perfect.  Putting aside the challenges of sharing books or battery problems, there is the problem of the walled garden. Once you have committed (say) to purchasing an ebook through Amazon, you can only read your book on a Kindle. While you can get a Kindle “App” for your iPad, this would be a different App from Apple’s built-in iBooks. Having a plethora of different readers and remembering which book is in which App is nonsensical: consumer behavior will be to choose one and stick to it.

This “App” problem is just one skirmish in a long-brewing war between the ebook distributors.  Consumers may not realize it, but ebook distributors have another weapon – a dirty little secret actually – to use in their fight:  censorship. Yes, censorship.

My latest book (Online PR and Social Media for Experts, 5th edition), was just submitted for electronic distribution, but was rejected because within the manuscript there were several links to the Amazon web site.  Not links to the Amazon store, but to two Amazon services that are important for the target audience – AuthorCentral and Askville.  I was told that if the book was to be sold on a Nook, Kobo, Apple iPad, Sony eReader or others, this content would have to go.  Guess what went.

In the olden days of traditional bookstores, this could never happen.  While you may be saddened  to see the death of so many independent bookstores (and some large ones), you should be more disturbed by the inappropriate use of the monopoly power by these new centurions.  Is what they are doing unlawful?  Not being a lawyer, I couldn’t say.  You may not care about my specific book, but what about others?  Imagine where this slippery slope might take us:  Will Amazon only agree to carry a product if the publisher adds only-for-Amazon extras?  Will Apple or Kobo only carry the product if an author changes the political angle of their manuscript?

I do support the right of ebook distributors to choose what they wish to carry.  But their behavior imposes yet another burden on a beleaguered publishing industry.  And it is an attack on the editorial freedom of writers.  Why should it fall to publishers, authors (and ultimately consumers) to be the pawns in their high-stakes world of ebook poker?  Let the competition be on an even playing field, without iCensorship.

This week’s action item:  Where are you buying your ebooks?  Before you decide to plunk down your cash, remember that you are not just deciding on a book, but an entire ebook ecosystem. 

Postscript for ebook distributors:  I am happy to update this article to note your policy of never rejecting a book because it contains a reference or link to a so-called competitor within the content of the manuscript.

Note: The Make It Happen Tipsheet is also available by email. Go to www.RandallCraig.com to register.

Randall Craig

@RandallCraig (follow me)
www.RandallCraig.com
www.ptadvisors.com
www.ProfessionallySpeakingTV.com
 
Join me on May 24th at 4pm EST for a look at Strategic Blogging. Click here for more information or to register.
Strategic Blogging - a webinar with Randall Craig

{ 0 comments }

No CEO wants to be known as a hypocrite.  But unfortunately, many are precisely that – here’s why.

There is an interesting conundrum that many companies face when expanding beyond their borders. A key reason for their success at home has been that they could take advantage of the homegrown business environment. They operated in a framework of laws, competition, and a well-understood social contract.

The challenge, however, is that when moving into a new market, companies are moving into an entire business environment which also includes foreign (to them) laws, competition, and a different social contract. They must follow one of two paths:

  • Stick to their better-from-home approach, and hopefully “disrupt” the market to their advantage.
  • Change their practices (and possibly ethics) to fit: When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

The key benefit of changing to fit is that the organization can truly take advantage of local advantages. The problem is when the local customs are fundamentally in conflict with home country ethics and laws.

The key benefit of bringing your ‘foreign’ perspective is that thinking differently can possibly bring a competitive advantage. And you don’t need to compromise your ethics.

While this is all relatively theoretical, there are practical implications to these choices.

Consider, for example, the development of the web and Social Media in China. This market is big, entrepreneurial, and as sophisticated as any in the west… except for their laws regarding censorship.  Local competitors (Baidu and Sina Weibo, for example) are thriving under these laws; reportedly Sina Weibo has 700 internal censors on the payroll.  It’s no surprise, then, when the international search engines and blogging platforms also become complicit in censoring their content.  Or when Twitter inserted a back-door “spying” entrance into their product.

Yes, social networks can be used for both good and bad. Witness the Arab spring, or how the police are using the tools to help identify perpetrators after riots. But let’s put aside this argument (net good / net bad), and speak to the obvious reasons why authoritarian regimes have problems with the tools: Social Networks are instruments of communication, collaboration, and community building. And when people are unhappy, these 3 C’s foment opposition, and sometimes even rebellion. It’s in the authoritarian interest to clamp down, control, and curtail (a different 3 C’s) the social web in their countries.

Many of the companies that seek to profit from those markets choose to be complicit, and bend to the local laws.  They are enablers of the “bad” 3 C’s – shame on them.

How ironic, therefore, that even if they feel uncomfortable with their complicity, many have similar policies internally themselves: closing access to – and monitoring – their employee’s social web access. For those unenlightened leaders who need it to be spelled out, choosing the right 3 C’s means greater connection to the market, greater collaboration internally and externally and a greater community of interest amongst clients and employees alike. This translates into higher employee engagement, better retention, more effective marketing, and higher sales. It’s hard to argue “open” in an international market, when their fears are shutting their social sphincter shut.

Yes, even the most enlightened organizations have concerns over productivity and business risk, so the need to control supposedly solves this problem.  These arguments are red herrings: the risks can be mitigated easily through policy, training, and communication. Unlike dictators who fear openness, corporate leaders would do well to embrace it – and model it – no matter how scary it may seem.

Is there a conflict between your organization’s policies externally, and the ground rules it enforces internally? In today’s world of many-to-many contact and community-building, philosophical alignment is no longer optional.  And without alignment, there is hypocrisy.

This week’s action plan: This parallel also works at the individual level, and well beyond just Social Media. If countries should be open, and corporations should be open, then surely we should be too.  (Are you?  Which 3 C’s are you most comfortable with?)

Note: The Make It Happen Tipsheet is also available by email. Go to www.RandallCraig.com to register.

Randall Craig

@RandallCraig (follow me)
www.RandallCraig.com
www.ptadvisors.com
www.ProfessionallySpeakingTV.com

{ 0 comments }

Three lessons from the Facebook prospectus

by RandallCraig February 23, 2012

If you’re reading this, the chances that you are on Facebook are relatively high. And sadly, the chances that you personally will duplicate Mark Zuckerberg’s business success are relatively low. Very few of us will take our companies public, let along profit so handsomely during our careers. What we can do, however, is learn from [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: Planning for an Uncertain Future

by RandallCraig November 23, 2011

In 1997 there was no Google. In 2002 there was no Facebook. There was no Twitter in 2004, and the iPad only made it’s debut in 2009. There is no indication that the pace of innovation will slow, so how can you plan for the future when the target is moving , and moving quickly? [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: Risky Business

by RandallCraig October 26, 2011

Picture this scenario: An employee gets charged with a serious offense and the company’s name gets mentioned repeatedly in the news reports.  The reporters found the connection to your organization by scanning through Social Media. Or this scenario: A subcontractor tweets (or posts pictures) celebrating the conclusion of a major, confidential project. This alerts competitors, [...]

Read More

Reflections on Steve Jobs and the impact of Apple

by Randall October 7, 2011

Steve Jobs was a visionary:  incredible focus, a market disruptor, a tech genius, a serial entrepreneur, and so on.  All true, but there is also something else – a thread that underlies and connects everything that Apple does: their focus on the empowered customer.  From day one, this was reflected in the user experience. It [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: Is the Cloud for the Birds?

by Randall September 1, 2011

If you read the business or technology press, you’ve probably heard about “the cloud”.  And if you believe the ad copy, just about any problem can be solved merely by “putting it on the cloud”.  Can this really be true?  Is the hype even close to reality?  And what is this cloud, really? The cloud [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: The case against social media regulation

by RandallCraig August 16, 2011

Should social media be regulated and controlled? Should hardware and network providers be forced to open a one-way window for authorities to monitor the flow of conversation? These questions are once again being asked, as supposedly “civilized” societies erupt into violence, riots, vandalism, and hooliganism. (Vancouver Canada and London England both come come to mind.) [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: 47 Tough Social Media Questions

by Randall March 22, 2011

How does your organization decide to invest in Social Media? With all of the fluff being written on the topic, it isn’t surprising that finding a list to help executives make better decisions is tough.  Based on our experience advising clients, here is my contribution, with questions in no particular order: 1.      What are the [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: Will Facebook Take Over the World?

by RandallCraig March 16, 2011

You may not know it, but the game playing, ad-serving, stalker-friendly site called Facebook is poised to bust out of it’s walled garden and move into the “real world” in a very big way. And when it does, it will have profound implications for government, other businesses, and each of us as individuals. Unless you [...]

Read More

Viewpoint: Does Free Always Mean Free?

by RandallCraig February 2, 2011

Beyond the embarrassing photos, new found friends, professional connections, and social gaming, there lurks a conflict – and conflict of interest – that most people know nothing about. On the one hand there are Social Media venues (including Google) all of whom have a business model that provides free consumer functionality in exchange for user-generated [...]

Read More